Sonam Kapoor" border="0">
Saturday 17 October 2009
Meghan McCain Breasts Twitter Pics Drama
Meghan McCain Breasts Twitter Pics Drama – Meghan McCain breasts pictures is creating a lot of controversy on the internet and is making Republicans very angry. Meghan McCain posted a photo revealing too much cleavage on Twitter recently.The daughter of former GOP presidential candidate John McCain who is being blasted left and right for the raunchy photo has published a piece called “Don’t Call Me a Slut.” to explain herself.
“I took a fun picture not thinking anything about what I was wearing, but apparently anything other than a pantsuit I am a slut.” She later added, “When I am alone in my apartment, I wear tank tops and sweat pants, I had no idea this makes me a ’slut’, I can’t even tell you how hurt I am.
I thought was funny and silly—and within a few hours I had caused a minor media scandal. I spent most of the next day thinking about what exactly was so shocking about the picture, why there was such an immediate and nasty overreaction. After all, it’s not like I was caught making a sex tape. I certainly didn’t pose nude for Playboy. And I hadn’t even exposed a nipple.
So why all this Sturm und Drang?
Could it be it’s because I have breasts? Because for those of you who didn’t know, I have two. They’re larger than some women’s and not as big as others. I don’t usually show off my cleavage—as I did in the photos I posted—which I will admit is not the smartest thing I have ever done. But it’s just not worth the drama it caused.
Seeing that Meghan is now a political spokesperson do you think that her photo is too risqué or does she deserve all she is getting for seeking the media’s attention?
Meghan McCain Breasts Twitter Pics Drama
Meghan McCain Breasts Twitter Pics Drama – Meghan McCain breasts pictures is creating a lot of controversy on the internet and is making Republicans very angry. Meghan McCain posted a photo revealing too much cleavage on Twitter recently.The daughter of former GOP presidential candidate John McCain who is being blasted left and right for the raunchy photo has published a piece called “Don’t Call Me a Slut.” to explain herself.
“I took a fun picture not thinking anything about what I was wearing, but apparently anything other than a pantsuit I am a slut.” She later added, “When I am alone in my apartment, I wear tank tops and sweat pants, I had no idea this makes me a ’slut’, I can’t even tell you how hurt I am.
I thought was funny and silly—and within a few hours I had caused a minor media scandal. I spent most of the next day thinking about what exactly was so shocking about the picture, why there was such an immediate and nasty overreaction. After all, it’s not like I was caught making a sex tape. I certainly didn’t pose nude for Playboy. And I hadn’t even exposed a nipple.
So why all this Sturm und Drang?
Could it be it’s because I have breasts? Because for those of you who didn’t know, I have two. They’re larger than some women’s and not as big as others. I don’t usually show off my cleavage—as I did in the photos I posted—which I will admit is not the smartest thing I have ever done. But it’s just not worth the drama it caused.
Seeing that Meghan is now a political spokesperson do you think that her photo is too risqué or does she deserve all she is getting for seeking the media’s attention?
Microsoft's plug-in puts Firefox users at risk
An add-on that Microsoft silently slipped into Mozilla's Firefox last February leaves the browser open to attack, Microsoft's security engineers acknowledged earlier this week.
One of the 13 security bulletins Microsoft released Tuesday affects not only Internet Explorer (IE), but also Firefox, thanks to a Microsoft-made plug-in pushed to Firefox users eight months ago in an update delivered via Windows Update.
"While the vulnerability is in an IE component, there is an attack vector for Firefox users as well," admitted Microsoft engineers in a post to the company's Security Research & Defense blog on Tuesday. "The reason is that .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 installs a 'Windows Presentation Foundation' plug-in in Firefox."
The Microsoft engineers described the possible threat as a "browse-and-get-owned" situation that only requires attackers to lure Firefox users to a rigged Web site.
Numerous users and experts complained when Microsoft pushed the .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (SP1) update to users last February, including Susan Bradley, a contributor to the popular Windows Secrets newsletter.
"The .NET Framework Assistant [the name of the add-on slipped into Firefox] that results can be installed inside Firefox without your approval," Bradley noted in a Feb. 12 story. "Although it was first installed with Microsoft's Visual Studio development program, I've seen this .NET component added to Firefox as part of the .NET Family patch."
What was particularly galling to users was that once installed, the .NET add-on was virtually impossible to remove from Firefox. The usual "Disable" and "Uninstall" buttons in Firefox's add-on list were grayed out on all versions of Windows except Windows 7, leaving most users no alternative other than to root through the Windows registry, a potentially dangerous chore, since a misstep could cripple the PC. Several sites posted complicated directions on how to scrub the .NET add-on from Firefox, including Annoyances.org.
Annoyances also said the threat to Firefox users is serious. "This update adds to Firefox one of the most dangerous vulnerabilities present in all versions of Internet Explorer: the ability for Web sites to easily and quietly install software on your PC," said the hints and tips site. "Since this design flaw is one of the reasons [why] you may have originally chosen to abandon IE in favor of a safer browser like Firefox, you may wish to remove this extension with all due haste."
Specifically, the.NET plug-in switched on a Microsoft technology dubbed ClickOnce, which lets .NET apps automatically download and run inside other browsers.
Microsoft reacted to criticism about the method it used to install the Firefox add-on by issuing another update in early May that made it possible to uninstall or disable the .NET Framework Assistant. It did not, however, apologize to Firefox users for slipping the add-on into their browsers without their explicit permission -- as generally the procedure for Firefox add-ons or extensions.
This week, Microsoft did not revisit the origin of the .NET add-on, but simply told Firefox users that they should uninstall the component if they weren't able to deploy the patches provided in the MS09-054 update.
According to Microsoft, the vulnerability is "critical," and also can be exploited against users running any version of IE, including IE8.
Microsoft's plug-in puts Firefox users at risk
An add-on that Microsoft silently slipped into Mozilla's Firefox last February leaves the browser open to attack, Microsoft's security engineers acknowledged earlier this week.
One of the 13 security bulletins Microsoft released Tuesday affects not only Internet Explorer (IE), but also Firefox, thanks to a Microsoft-made plug-in pushed to Firefox users eight months ago in an update delivered via Windows Update.
"While the vulnerability is in an IE component, there is an attack vector for Firefox users as well," admitted Microsoft engineers in a post to the company's Security Research & Defense blog on Tuesday. "The reason is that .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 installs a 'Windows Presentation Foundation' plug-in in Firefox."
The Microsoft engineers described the possible threat as a "browse-and-get-owned" situation that only requires attackers to lure Firefox users to a rigged Web site.
Numerous users and experts complained when Microsoft pushed the .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 (SP1) update to users last February, including Susan Bradley, a contributor to the popular Windows Secrets newsletter.
"The .NET Framework Assistant [the name of the add-on slipped into Firefox] that results can be installed inside Firefox without your approval," Bradley noted in a Feb. 12 story. "Although it was first installed with Microsoft's Visual Studio development program, I've seen this .NET component added to Firefox as part of the .NET Family patch."
What was particularly galling to users was that once installed, the .NET add-on was virtually impossible to remove from Firefox. The usual "Disable" and "Uninstall" buttons in Firefox's add-on list were grayed out on all versions of Windows except Windows 7, leaving most users no alternative other than to root through the Windows registry, a potentially dangerous chore, since a misstep could cripple the PC. Several sites posted complicated directions on how to scrub the .NET add-on from Firefox, including Annoyances.org.
Annoyances also said the threat to Firefox users is serious. "This update adds to Firefox one of the most dangerous vulnerabilities present in all versions of Internet Explorer: the ability for Web sites to easily and quietly install software on your PC," said the hints and tips site. "Since this design flaw is one of the reasons [why] you may have originally chosen to abandon IE in favor of a safer browser like Firefox, you may wish to remove this extension with all due haste."
Specifically, the.NET plug-in switched on a Microsoft technology dubbed ClickOnce, which lets .NET apps automatically download and run inside other browsers.
Microsoft reacted to criticism about the method it used to install the Firefox add-on by issuing another update in early May that made it possible to uninstall or disable the .NET Framework Assistant. It did not, however, apologize to Firefox users for slipping the add-on into their browsers without their explicit permission -- as generally the procedure for Firefox add-ons or extensions.
This week, Microsoft did not revisit the origin of the .NET add-on, but simply told Firefox users that they should uninstall the component if they weren't able to deploy the patches provided in the MS09-054 update.
According to Microsoft, the vulnerability is "critical," and also can be exploited against users running any version of IE, including IE8.
Friday 9 October 2009
10 Funniest Photos Of Kids Staring At Women’s Boobs
10. The “Your Boobs Have Hypnotized Me” Kid.
9. Harry Potter and the Goblet Of Boobage.
8. The “Love You Long Time” Kid.
7. The Baby Prodigy.
6. The Future Frat Boy.
5. The Hooters Kid.
4. The Reason Michael Phelps Spent So Much Time In The Water.
3. The Sneaky Kid.
2. The “You Don’t Look Anything Like Mommy” Kid.
1. The “You Just Blew My Mind” Kid.
10 Funniest Photos Of Kids Staring At Women’s Boobs
10. The “Your Boobs Have Hypnotized Me” Kid.
9. Harry Potter and the Goblet Of Boobage.
8. The “Love You Long Time” Kid.
7. The Baby Prodigy.
6. The Future Frat Boy.
5. The Hooters Kid.
4. The Reason Michael Phelps Spent So Much Time In The Water.
3. The Sneaky Kid.
2. The “You Don’t Look Anything Like Mommy” Kid.
1. The “You Just Blew My Mind” Kid.
20 Things In Nature That Look Exactly Like Boobs
20. Mushroom Boobs
Did mother nature get a… cap job?
19. Slutty Hills
That’s some fierce hair around the areolae.
18. Naughty Tree-Lady
We’re not going to make a joke about “sporting wood.” If you want that kind of crap, watch “Accidentally on Purpose” or one of the many other turd-ridden Jenna Elfman vehicles.
17. Frog with Big-Ol-’Uns
Actually, now I’m jealous. How come my pet doesn’t have bigger breasts? Is there a goldfish plastic surgeon I could see, immediately?
16. Oranges
Juicy, round oranges look hot. Plus, if you like orange-skinned women, this is about as close as you will get without hanging outside a tanning salon.
15. More Mushroom Boobs
It’s simply amazing how an ordinary fungi can have such a sexy look. I wonder if mushrooms have any other magical properties.
14. Cactus
I keep telling myself to stop groping it. I keep ending up in the emergency room.
13. Loquat Fruit
I’m pretty sure that, in some language, “loquat” translates to “motorboat.”
12. Melons
Also, note that they look like testes. I’m not sure if that excites me even more.
11. Hills “At Attention”
It must be a cold day.
10. Even More Mushrooms
Why does every mushroom look like an (albeit lopsided) rack? It’s just like those Rorschach inkblots they gave me in junior high. Boobs are all I see!
9. Chinese Cliffs
You know what they say, “Once you’ve climbed Chinese mountains… you’ll never go back.” Although, I think that saying may have originally applied to strict Chinese border enforcement policies.
8. Another Dirty Debauched Tree
This is why there aren’t more family fun days spent in the park. That and all the homeless junkies that live there.
7. Lemons
If you juxtapose two of any fruit just right, you get a tight set of headlights. I went with lemons.
6. More Fungi Boobs
In unrelated news, I found a field of mushrooms I want to marry.
5. Cactus Boobs
Cacti have always been the cocktease of the desert.
4. Magic Mountains
There’s four of them! Why is that sexy, but cows’ udders aren’t?
3. Ocean Rocks
It must be a sight when the white ocean foam gushes between them.
2. Boob Island
Many a lonely sailor has crashed their vessel between these beauties.
1. Mushrooms Again!
They’re back for the top spot. Fungi easily sport the best racks of the natural world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)